I will look at Immigration from persepective of phenomenology and its somewhat foucauldian understanding of governmentality in third way marxism that integrates phenomenology. The term economism has been kept as a primary reason to close the state borders from immigration. There are different ideas of which sector of being clearly defined kind of legitimizes the sovereign. My hypotheses is that in the economic times of third way economic policies just behind us economic is the most clearly defined category to legitimize sovereign and its borders in many senses. Economism as reason to keep borders closed is paradoxical since economic activity most clearly penetrates the borders. Poststructuralist analysis of flows like in Gilles Deleuze or of hospitality in political sense and context in Jacques Derrida are important. Phenomenology helps to understand governmentality as I will argue/show. It can also help to see keeping people out of sovereign - like the state as question of governmentality. The question becomes technical question of governmentality. the point and argument is to sketch out the technical governmentality concerning the immigration question mostly after all phenomenologically.
Patomäki, J. (2024). Phenomenology, Marxism in Question of Immigration. Iranian Yearbook of Phenomenology, 2(1), 217-231. doi: 10.22034/iyp.2021.245800
MLA
Joel Patomäki. "Phenomenology, Marxism in Question of Immigration". Iranian Yearbook of Phenomenology, 2, 1, 2024, 217-231. doi: 10.22034/iyp.2021.245800
HARVARD
Patomäki, J. (2024). 'Phenomenology, Marxism in Question of Immigration', Iranian Yearbook of Phenomenology, 2(1), pp. 217-231. doi: 10.22034/iyp.2021.245800
VANCOUVER
Patomäki, J. Phenomenology, Marxism in Question of Immigration. Iranian Yearbook of Phenomenology, 2024; 2(1): 217-231. doi: 10.22034/iyp.2021.245800
)